General anesthesia versus conscious sedation during endovascular treatment in posterior circulation large vessel occlusion: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Purpose: The optimal anesthetic approach in the endovascular treatment (EVT) of patients with posterior circulation large vessel occlusion (PC-LVO) strokes is not clear. Little data has been published and no randomized clinical trials have been conducted so far. We aimed to perform an updated meta-analysis to compare clinical and procedural outcomes between conscious sedation (CS) and general anesthesia (GA). Methods: We reviewed the literature of the studies reporting CS and GA in patients with endovascularly-treated PC-LVO. The primary outcome was the functional outcome at 3 months measured using the modified Rankin Scale (mRS). A good functional outcome was defined as having a mRS 0-2. Secondary outcomes were mortality at 3 months, final successful recanalization (modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (mTICI) scale from 2b to 3) and complete recanalization (mTICI of 3) and times from stroke onset to EVT completion. Random-effects models were completed to pool the outcomes and the I 2 value was calculated to assess heterogeneity. Findings: Eight studies with a total of 1351 patients were included. The pooled results reveal that CS use was associated with higher rates of good outcome (OR 2.41, 95% CI 1.58-3.64, I 2 = 49.67%) and with lower mortality at 3 months (OR 0.48, 95% CI 0.28-0.82, I 2 =57.11%). No significant differences were observed in the final reperfusion rates, procedural duration, and time from stroke onset to EVT completion. Conclusion: In this meta-analysis, GA was associated with significantly lower rates of functional independence at 3 months in patients with PC-LVO strokes.

Progressive Lacunar Strokes: A Predictive Score.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Progressive lacunar syndromes (PLS) occur in up to 20-30% of patients with lacunar strokes, increasing the risk of long term dependency. Our aim is to develop a predictive score to identify patients at high risk of presenting PLS. METHODS: We derived a risk score for PLS in a cohort of consecutive patients (n=187) presenting with one of the five classic lacunar syndromes (LS) and absence of vascular occlusion, perfusion deficit or symptomatic stenosis. A risk score was developed using the coefficients from the logistic regression model, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was conducted to assess the prognostic value of the risk score. Sensitivity, specificity and accuracy were estimated for each total point score. RESULTS: Out of 187 patients included in our sample, 52 (27.8%) presented PLS. Previous history of diabetes mellitus (1 point), diastolic blood pressure at admission (2 points), clinical deficits consistent with a pure motor syndrome (1 point) and asymptomatic intracranial atheromatosis or stenosis in non-symptomatic territory (1 point) were independent predictors for PLS. The estimated area under the ROC curve for this model was 0.77 (95% CI,0.68 - 0.84). CONCLUSION: This score could be a useful tool in routine clinical practice to predict the occurrence of PLS, allowing the identification of those patients with LS who are at high risk of long term dependency due to early neurological worsening, and who would benefit the most from an intensive treatment.